Message154870
| Author |
larry |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, gvanrossum, larry, loewis, pitrou, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall, vstinner |
| Date |
2012年03月04日.00:48:38 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0159223 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1330822118.97.0.901425898721.issue14127@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I grant you that (int, float) is probably, theoretically better than (int, int). But it's academic as Guido has ruled against anything but a straight int representing nanoseconds, and I doubt he's gonna change his mind. |
|