Message154869
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, gvanrossum, larry, loewis, pitrou, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall, vstinner |
| Date |
2012年03月04日.00:43:12 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0020495134 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1330821556.3362.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<1330821623.92.0.41442786008.issue14127@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> Well, Guido has already nixed future-proof formats, see his comments
> above:
I don't think Guido is *against* future-proof formats per se, he's
against them when they have a cost compared to non future-proof ones.
The proposal I made (a (integral part, float fractional part) tuple)
doesn't have a cost compared to the plain (int seconds, int nanoseconds)
tuple proposal.
(of course, you can also have nanoseconds as a float, but that starts
being weird) |
|