Message154866
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, gvanrossum, larry, loewis, pitrou, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall, vstinner |
| Date |
2012年03月04日.00:37:58 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0017152192 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1330821242.3362.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<1330820664.37.0.722687223014.issue14127@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> Actually, I'm hoping that by the time we get better than nanosecond
> resolution, we can also switch to 128-bit floats, and then the
> existing st_[acm]time field will become the preferred representation
> once more.
What if your hope isn't fulfilled? That doesn't sound like a reasonable
decision-making strategy. |
|