Message154760
| Author |
eric.araujo |
| Recipients |
docs@python, eli.bendersky, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, fdrake, flox, loewis, orsenthil, pitrou, python-dev, rhettinger, scoder, tshepang |
| Date |
2012年03月02日.10:51:30 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.000562064 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1330685491.26.0.626883732291.issue11379@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I think I’ve always understood "lightweight" to mean "minimal". xml.dom provides minidom, a basic implementation, pulldom, a different implementation, and other libraries such as 4Dom are full-fledged implementations. So "lightweight" is not a problem to me (but I acknowledge that it might be misleading for other people), especially given that I think that DOM itself is not elegant or lightweight (as in "conceptually small"). |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年03月02日 10:51:31 | eric.araujo | set | recipients:
+ eric.araujo, loewis, fdrake, rhettinger, orsenthil, pitrou, scoder, ezio.melotti, eli.bendersky, flox, docs@python, tshepang, python-dev |
| 2012年03月02日 10:51:31 | eric.araujo | set | messageid: <1330685491.26.0.626883732291.issue11379@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年03月02日 10:51:30 | eric.araujo | link | issue11379 messages |
| 2012年03月02日 10:51:30 | eric.araujo | create |
|