Message154745
| Author |
ezio.melotti |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, Ramchandra Apte, brian.curtin, eric.araujo, eric.snow, ezio.melotti, gregory.p.smith, gruszczy, meatballhat, rhettinger |
| Date |
2012年03月02日.07:45:52 |
| SpamBayes Score |
2.942302e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1330674353.24.0.548013807115.issue8706@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> also: just because an argument is listed in the docs with a name does
> not mean that that name is the most appropriate; part of adding keyword
> support should be choosing a sensible name.
I agree, but other implementations might not have this limitation and might already use the name that appears in the documentation/docstring -- or even a better one.
> I intend to bring this up for a brief discussion at the language summit
> next week
+1 |
|