homepage

Thanks for the feedback.
> So, that would mean instead of
> get_distribution(name).metadata['Version']
> you'd use
> get_metadata(name)['Version']
> ?
> I'm not sure that's really buys you much.
Yeah. At the moment we also have get_distribution(name).version, which I hope is not deemed ugly.
> I don't entirely remember my objections to the API, but I wonder if you couldn't provide
> attribute access via properties on .metadata? Or are there keys that can't be mapped to
> identifiers (modulo typical dash-to-underscore mappings)?
In distutils1, the metadata fields were accessed as attributes. I think using a mapping interface makes more sense and is nicer to use.
Rejecting for now.