Message154218
| Author |
tim.golden |
| Recipients |
docs@python, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, terry.reedy, tim.golden, tshepang |
| Date |
2012年02月25日.09:18:29 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.012871585 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<4F48A758.2010102@timgolden.me.uk> |
| In-reply-to |
<1330157380.77.0.852681869193.issue14112@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
On 25/02/2012 08:09, Ezio Melotti wrote:
> Even if they know the meaning of "shallow" (which is not a really common word AFAICT)
FWIW it's pretty much the only way of saying what it means.
I've no idea how many people used it last year or anything,
but if I needed to express the concept of the opposite of
deep I would struggle to find another word. Except, perhaps,
the doublespeak-like "not deep". Undeep? Double-plus undeep? |
|