Message154169
| Author |
nadeem.vawda |
| Recipients |
loewis, nadeem.vawda, pitrou, python-dev, vstinner |
| Date |
2012年02月25日.00:03:53 |
| SpamBayes Score |
2.295975e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1330128234.77.0.966000748931.issue14107@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> I ran test_bigmem on my computer. The test pass but it is really slow.
Is this with or without the fix you just pushed? How much RAM does your
system have? I tried running with "-M 4.5G" on my 8GB machine earlier
today, and it ate through all of my RAM plus 4GB of swap before the OOM
killer terminated it.
> Do you need these tests using so much memory (and are really slow)?
In general, I think it's important to exercise cases where 32-bit
truncation issues and the like might arise, because otherwise they'll lie
around undetected until they bite some unsuspecting user at an
inopportune moment. But I don't know much about those specific tests, so
I can't really offer much of an opinion here.
[Still, 48GB minimum? ೦_೦ ] |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年02月25日 00:03:54 | nadeem.vawda | set | recipients:
+ nadeem.vawda, loewis, pitrou, vstinner, python-dev |
| 2012年02月25日 00:03:54 | nadeem.vawda | set | messageid: <1330128234.77.0.966000748931.issue14107@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年02月25日 00:03:54 | nadeem.vawda | link | issue14107 messages |
| 2012年02月25日 00:03:53 | nadeem.vawda | create |
|