Message154156
| Author |
eli.bendersky |
| Recipients |
docs@python, eli.bendersky, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, rhettinger, terry.reedy, tshepang |
| Date |
2012年02月24日.20:30:08 |
| SpamBayes Score |
8.083688e-08 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1330115409.43.0.974912214476.issue14097@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Ezio, your fix for 8 is definitely good. Space makes it cleaner, as well as compliant to PEP 8, which explicitly recommends to surround operators with spaces.
Note, however, that this should be applied in other places as well, not only the complex number samples. For example:
2+2
(50-5*6)/4
etc.
There's quite a bit of inconsistency in the samples. Some surround operators with spaces and some don't. I think converging on a single consistent, PEP 8 compliant convention of surrounding with spaces always throughout the tutorial is a good idea. |
|