Message154064
| Author |
robodan |
| Recipients |
eric.araujo, eric.smith, robodan, vinay.sajip |
| Date |
2012年02月23日.14:47:35 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00013411904 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1330008456.13.0.707927106957.issue1521950@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I haven't been following this much. Sorry. My day job isn't in this area any more (and I'm stuck using 2.4 :-().
Looking at the docs, I notice the "old" is different from what it used to be. Notably: 'e;' gets split into two tokens; and ">'abc';" gets split into 3. I'm pretty sure that baseline code doesn't split those at all. So there is a question of if "old" is fully backward compatible.
The "new" functionality looks great. That's what I was looking for when I filed the bug.
Thank you!
-Dan |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年02月23日 14:47:36 | robodan | set | recipients:
+ robodan, vinay.sajip, eric.smith, eric.araujo |
| 2012年02月23日 14:47:36 | robodan | set | messageid: <1330008456.13.0.707927106957.issue1521950@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年02月23日 14:47:35 | robodan | link | issue1521950 messages |
| 2012年02月23日 14:47:35 | robodan | create |
|