Message153557
| Author |
eric.araujo |
| Recipients |
docs@python, eli.bendersky, eric.araujo |
| Date |
2012年02月17日.16:06:28 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.0402884e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1329494792.81.0.249946872868.issue14009@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> If you want to collect additional feedback, you may want to add some other
> people to the Nosy list :-)
I did not want more feedback, I wanted to leave time for interested parties to find this bug for themselves and eventually comment :)
One question: when I merge the new doc from 3.2 to 3.3, do I remove the new section, as the cET module is now deprecated? If I do that we’d lose the indexing (i.e. without a module directive there will be no entry in the module index not the alphabetical index). I could leave the cET section so that we get the indexing but change the text to "Deprecated alias of ET." |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年02月17日 16:06:32 | eric.araujo | set | recipients:
+ eric.araujo, eli.bendersky, docs@python |
| 2012年02月17日 16:06:32 | eric.araujo | set | messageid: <1329494792.81.0.249946872868.issue14009@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年02月17日 16:06:29 | eric.araujo | link | issue14009 messages |
| 2012年02月17日 16:06:28 | eric.araujo | create |
|