Message153454
| Author |
eli.bendersky |
| Recipients |
docs@python, eli.bendersky, eric.araujo |
| Date |
2012年02月16日.03:48:43 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00016029445 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1329364125.78.0.0202965508128.issue14009@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Éric, indeed it clarifies the usage, but my concern is that it also moves the first mention of the module further down.
There's no real reason for someone using CPython 2.7 or 3.2 *not* to use cET. So, some mention should appear in the opening paragraph. I'm attaching a patch that shows one possibility (based on your patch). It was generated vs. branch 2.7 |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年02月16日 03:48:45 | eli.bendersky | set | recipients:
+ eli.bendersky, eric.araujo, docs@python |
| 2012年02月16日 03:48:45 | eli.bendersky | set | messageid: <1329364125.78.0.0202965508128.issue14009@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年02月16日 03:48:45 | eli.bendersky | link | issue14009 messages |
| 2012年02月16日 03:48:44 | eli.bendersky | create |
|