Message153149
| Author |
eric.araujo |
| Recipients |
benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, ned.deily, python-dev, tarek |
| Date |
2012年02月12日.03:03:00 |
| SpamBayes Score |
3.0462607e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1329015781.69.0.513202562075.issue13994@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
FWIW I approve of the patch.
Quoting Ned:
> this isn't the first time we've been burned by the after effects of the 2.7 Distutils
> revert. I really think we should go through and make sure there aren't other unnecessary
> discrepancies between the current state of 2.7.x and 3.2.x/default.
The revert indiscriminately reverted new features and bug and doc fixes, some of which have been fixed again later when rediscovered. I never did a systematic review but I could. One of the most painful difference between 2.7 and 3.x is the use of urllib vs. httplib in the register and upload commands, which does not let me port patches easily. |
|