Message153112
| Author |
eli.bendersky |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, effbot, eli.bendersky, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, flox, scoder |
| Date |
2012年02月11日.08:58:00 |
| SpamBayes Score |
7.072735e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1328950680.67.0.791108024566.issue13988@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
>> I find it perfectly legitimate to run Python code from a C module.
Certainly not a hack. We all know that most non-trivial functionality can
be expressed much easier in Python than in C, that's why we use Python
after all. In particular, defining a class with attributes and methods is a couple of lines of code in Python, but a huge amount of code in C. Avoiding the complexity of writing everything in C, or even of splitting the code in a harder to understand way, is worth it.
<<
There can be arguments both way, but if we follow the lead of existing standard extension modules, the tendency is clearly not to use PyRun_String. Many C extensions use functionality from Python, but none does it the "bootstrap way". Why is that? Is there a good reason, or is it just convention? |
|