Message152625
| Author |
neologix |
| Recipients |
giampaolo.rodola, nadeem.vawda, neologix |
| Date |
2012年02月04日.15:10:10 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.1593912e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1328368211.14.0.106052430413.issue13878@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
"""
for x in [0.05, 0.04, 0.03, 0.02, 0.01]:
z = scheduler.enter(x, 1, fun, (x,))
"""
Since the test uses relative times, if the process is preempted more than 0.01s between two calls to enter (or if the clock goes backwards), the absolute times won't be monotonic:
time.time() -> t
scheduler.enter(0.05, 1, fun, (0.05,)) -> scheduler.enterabs(t+0.05, 1, fun, (0,))
<preempted for 0.02s/clock goes backwards>
time.time() -> t+0.02
scheduler.enter(0.04, 1, fun, (0.04,)) -> scheduler.enterabs(t+0.02+0.04=t+0.06, 1, fun, (0,))
and 0.04 would end up after 0.05 in the queue.
Changing the sequence for [0.5, 0.4, 0.3, 0.2, 0.1] should make the test more robust (other tests seem to have the same problem). |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年02月04日 15:10:11 | neologix | set | recipients:
+ neologix, giampaolo.rodola, nadeem.vawda |
| 2012年02月04日 15:10:11 | neologix | set | messageid: <1328368211.14.0.106052430413.issue13878@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年02月04日 15:10:10 | neologix | link | issue13878 messages |
| 2012年02月04日 15:10:10 | neologix | create |
|