Message152447
| Author |
mark.dickinson |
| Recipients |
Garen, John.Cary, abenard, alexis, cgohlke, eric.araujo, eric.smith, koen, loewis, mark.dickinson, mhammond, python-dev, sable, tarek, techtonik |
| Date |
2012年02月02日.00:17:31 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0013696428 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1328141852.49.0.933522270907.issue7833@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Mark: Possibly a stupid question, but in your commit (see snippet below), why is the processorArchitecture hard coded to "x86"? Is it appropriate to replace this with "amd64" for 64-bit builds, or should it always be "x86"?
+ <dependentAssembly>
+ <assemblyIdentity type="win32" name="Microsoft.VC90.CRT"
+ version="9.0.21022.8" processorArchitecture="x86"
+ publicKeyToken="XXXX">
+ </assemblyIdentity>
+ </dependentAssembly> |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年02月02日 00:17:32 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients:
+ mark.dickinson, loewis, mhammond, sable, eric.smith, techtonik, koen, tarek, eric.araujo, cgohlke, Garen, alexis, John.Cary, python-dev, abenard |
| 2012年02月02日 00:17:32 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <1328141852.49.0.933522270907.issue7833@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年02月02日 00:17:31 | mark.dickinson | link | issue7833 messages |
| 2012年02月02日 00:17:31 | mark.dickinson | create |
|