Message152359
| Author |
Alexander.Belopolsky |
| Recipients |
Alexander.Belopolsky, Arfrever, belopolsky, eric.smith, loewis, mark.dickinson, pitrou, skrah, vstinner |
| Date |
2012年01月30日.23:24:25 |
| SpamBayes Score |
8.632746e-08 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<CAP7h-xYZWhrDSfzb9RLKhFiX9dLHfLPtUmaiqpp2wCVOD5fCfQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1327965329.96.0.695497919885.issue13882@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:15 PM, STINNER Victor <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> Another possibility is what I proposed before in the issue #11457: take a callback argument.
> http://bugs.python.org/issue11457#msg143738
I think you are over-engineering a complicated solution to a simple
problem. If you want to add functionality to time module, add a
function with a new name that would mimic appropriate POSIX API and
return a (named) tuple of integers where C function would populate a
struct. If you write a new high resolution time module - import
decimal at the top of the module and make all your clocks return
seconds as Decimal objects. |
|