Message152322
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
Alexander.Belopolsky, Arfrever, belopolsky, ericography, jcea, khenriksson, larry, lars.gustaebel, loewis, mark.dickinson, nadeem.vawda, r.david.murray, rhettinger, rosslagerwall, skrah, vstinner |
| Date |
2012年01月30日.14:38:25 |
| SpamBayes Score |
5.8682086e-09 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<CAMpsgwa=r3aUDXWU=eXThftr6kJ21U0YFH_8mPARs8AS2YFvEg@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1327933258.01.0.0057281920586.issue11457@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> (secs, nsecs) tuples are more practical in performance-critical applications
> (e.g. synchronization of timestamps between 2 trees with large number of files).
This is also why I propose an argument to choose the format: everyone
has a different use case and use cases are incompatible. Tuples are
quick to create but has not a practical API, datetime has a nice API
but also issues listed before by Martin (and don't support nanosecond
resolution currently), Decimal has a nice API but is expensive to
create, etc. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年01月30日 14:38:26 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, loewis, rhettinger, jcea, mark.dickinson, belopolsky, lars.gustaebel, larry, nadeem.vawda, Arfrever, r.david.murray, skrah, Alexander.Belopolsky, rosslagerwall, khenriksson, ericography |
| 2012年01月30日 14:38:25 | vstinner | link | issue11457 messages |
| 2012年01月30日 14:38:25 | vstinner | create |
|