Message152174
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
jcon, kristjan.jonsson, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, paul.moore, petri.lehtinen, pitrou, pv, rupole, skrah, teoliphant, vstinner |
| Date |
2012年01月28日.17:29:11 |
| SpamBayes Score |
6.2108693e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1327771617.8904.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<1327771158.38.0.886998726481.issue10181@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> Nick Coghlan <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> > Radical suggestion: make it public as collections.simple_ndarray?
>
> Heh, that's a nice one. :)
Well, the question is: does it have a point? Is this ndarray useful
outside of any third-party infrastructure such as the APIs offered by
numpy?
You might answer that we already have array.array but ISTM that
array.array is quite useless in general :) |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年01月28日 17:29:12 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, teoliphant, paul.moore, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, rupole, kristjan.jonsson, vstinner, pv, skrah, jcon, petri.lehtinen |
| 2012年01月28日 17:29:12 | pitrou | link | issue10181 messages |
| 2012年01月28日 17:29:11 | pitrou | create |
|