Message151873
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
Alexander.Belopolsky, Arfrever, belopolsky, ericography, jcea, khenriksson, larry, lars.gustaebel, loewis, mark.dickinson, nadeem.vawda, r.david.murray, rhettinger, rosslagerwall, skrah, vstinner |
| Date |
2012年01月24日.01:25:37 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00010020225 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1327368338.75.0.94048788967.issue11457@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
With the new function time.wallclock() and time.clock_gettime() (issue #10278), and maybe time.monotonic() will maybe be also added (issue #13846), I now agree that it is important to support t2-t1 to compute a difference. Using a tuple, it's not easy to compute a difference.
time.wallclock(), time.clock_gettime() and time.monotonic() have a nanosecond resolution on Linux. Using issue #13845, time.time() will have a resolution of 100 ns on Windows. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年01月24日 01:25:38 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, loewis, rhettinger, jcea, mark.dickinson, belopolsky, lars.gustaebel, larry, nadeem.vawda, Arfrever, r.david.murray, skrah, Alexander.Belopolsky, rosslagerwall, khenriksson, ericography |
| 2012年01月24日 01:25:38 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1327368338.75.0.94048788967.issue11457@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年01月24日 01:25:38 | vstinner | link | issue11457 messages |
| 2012年01月24日 01:25:37 | vstinner | create |
|