Message151213
| Author |
cameron |
| Recipients |
amaury.forgeotdarc, cameron, docs@python, eric.araujo, georg.brandl, python-dev, techtonik, terry.reedy, vstinner |
| Date |
2012年01月14日.03:34:58 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.02223518 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1326512100.05.0.755740049401.issue11633@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Putting the wording into 2.7 might be nice, but I thought it was in bugfix only mode.
Regarding UNIX only, I'd avoid it; any file may be buffered in almost any way on any platform. Saying an explicit flush call may be necessary for immediate output is _not_ UNIX only and would be very misleading. Remembering that ~UNIX != Windows.
Telling users to explicitly call flush to ensure immediate output where that is necessary ensures portable coding (or ought to, user pigheadedness discounted:-) |
|