Message151156
| Author |
poke |
| Recipients |
aronacher, draghuram, eric.araujo, ethan.furman, ezio.melotti, mrabarnett, ncoghlan, pitrou, poke, rhettinger, steven.daprano |
| Date |
2012年01月12日.22:39:54 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00021464554 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1326407995.38.0.860930973923.issue6210@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Yeah, I would really like that solution, especially as it separates from the `from X` syntax that sets the exception’s cause.
Also I would prefer a syntax solution over a class method simply because the exception context is something that is implicitely set by Python with the `raise` statement. So it would make sense to overwrite that behaviour with a syntax construct as well. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年01月12日 22:39:55 | poke | set | recipients:
+ poke, rhettinger, ncoghlan, pitrou, draghuram, aronacher, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, mrabarnett, steven.daprano, ethan.furman |
| 2012年01月12日 22:39:55 | poke | set | messageid: <1326407995.38.0.860930973923.issue6210@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年01月12日 22:39:54 | poke | link | issue6210 messages |
| 2012年01月12日 22:39:54 | poke | create |
|