Message150997
| Author |
terry.reedy |
| Recipients |
docs@python, eric.araujo, methane, r.david.murray, santoso.wijaya, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2012年01月10日.03:11:58 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0006859552 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1326165119.96.0.122243773085.issue11418@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
This paragraph follows a discussion and example of the fact that methods do *not* have to be defined within a class statement.
Any objections to changing
"The global scope associated with a method is the module containing the class definition. (The class itself is never used as a global scope.)"
to
"The global scope associated with a method is the module containing its definition. (A class is never used as a global scope.)"
? |
|