Message150834
| Author |
hynek |
| Recipients |
eric.araujo, hynek, mrts, neologix, petri.lehtinen, pitrou, rosslagerwall, schmir, tarek, teamnoir |
| Date |
2012年01月08日.00:15:50 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.7646542e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<607C351611E54406973EB6E489589DF1@gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1325958902.3435.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| Content |
> > What's the current state here? Anyone working on a solution or are we
> > waiting how http://hg.python.org/features/pathlib/ will work out?
>
> Well, I am not working on that one, so waiting for it to work out might
> be optimistic :)
> I don't know what to do with it (the pathlib): is such a feature
> desireable enough?
Independently from this bug, I'd say it would be a good thing.
Proof: http://twistedmatrix.com/documents/current/api/twisted.python.filepath.html – Twisted already implemented something similar for themselves.
> > If the consensus is to add a generic walker method, wouldn't be
> > appropriate to open a new bug and add it as dependency?
>
> Agreed.
See #13734 |
|