Message150810
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
eric.araujo, hynek, mrts, neologix, petri.lehtinen, pitrou, rosslagerwall, schmir, tarek, teamnoir |
| Date |
2012年01月07日.17:56:23 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00012783823 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1325958902.3435.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<1325941987.22.0.377706666189.issue4489@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> What's the current state here? Anyone working on a solution or are we
> waiting how http://hg.python.org/features/pathlib/ will work out?
Well, I am not working on that one, so waiting for it to work out might
be optimistic :)
I don't know what to do with it (the pathlib): is such a feature
desireable enough?
> If the consensus is to add a generic walker method, wouldn't be
> appropriate to open a new bug and add it as dependency?
Agreed. |
|