homepage

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author kxroberto
Recipients adrien-saladin, kxroberto, r.david.murray
Date 2012年01月01日.17:38:48
SpamBayes Score 9.9287675e-08
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1325439529.8.0.861444843746.issue10839@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I think really ill/strange is that kind of item _assignments_ do _add_ multiple.
If msg[field] = xy would just add-first/replace-frist , and only msg.add_xxxx/.append(field, xy) would add multiples that would be clear and understandable/readable. 
(The sophisticated check dictionary is unnecessary IMHO, I don't expect the class to be ever smart enough for a full RFC checklist.)
e.g. I remember a bug like
msg[field] = xy
if special_condition:
 msg[field] = abc # just wanted a alternative
Never ever expected a double header here!
"=" with adding behavior is absurd IMHO. Certainly doesn't allow readable code.
History
Date User Action Args
2012年01月01日 17:38:49kxrobertosetrecipients: + kxroberto, r.david.murray, adrien-saladin
2012年01月01日 17:38:49kxrobertosetmessageid: <1325439529.8.0.861444843746.issue10839@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012年01月01日 17:38:49kxrobertolinkissue10839 messages
2012年01月01日 17:38:48kxrobertocreate

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /