Message150036
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
eric.araujo, eric.smith, exarkun, giampaolo.rodola, meatballhat, milko.krachounov, neologix, olemis, pitrou, tarek, vstinner |
| Date |
2011年12月21日.19:15:08 |
| SpamBayes Score |
5.4918927e-09 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1324494909.65.0.099332420871.issue8604@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> I'm not sure about the best module to host this, though: os.path ?
Some OS don't provide atomic rename. If we only define a function when it is atomic (as we do in the posix module, only expose functions available on the OS), programs will have to write two versions of their function. I prefer to write a "best-effort" function, and so I consider that shutil is the best place for such function.
If this function requires a function specific to the OS, the specific function can be added to posix (or another module).
Example:
with shutil.write_file(filename) as f:
f.write("I hope it will be atomic!")
We need an "atomic rename file" function to implement "atomic write file": see #8828. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年12月21日 19:15:09 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, exarkun, pitrou, eric.smith, giampaolo.rodola, tarek, eric.araujo, olemis, meatballhat, milko.krachounov, neologix |
| 2011年12月21日 19:15:09 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1324494909.65.0.099332420871.issue8604@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011年12月21日 19:15:09 | vstinner | link | issue8604 messages |
| 2011年12月21日 19:15:08 | vstinner | create |
|