Message150028
| Author |
nikratio |
| Recipients |
Julian, eric.araujo, eric.snow, giampaolo.rodola, ncoghlan, nikratio, rhettinger, smarnach |
| Date |
2011年12月21日.18:15:10 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00047573537 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<4EF2222D.6010201@rath.org> |
| In-reply-to |
<1324486983.89.0.30111495326.issue13585@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
On 12/21/2011 12:03 PM, Éric Araujo wrote:
>
> Éric Araujo <merwok@netwok.org> added the comment:
>
>>> In the passage I quoted, I don’t understand what is meant by "non-Python resources".
>> Think about e.g. mounting a file system.
>
> Ah, ok. In that case there would still be a Python-level object (just like a Python file object will also release the OS-level handle when it’s closed).
I don't think so.
subprocess.check_call(['mount', 'bla', '/mnt'])
Allocates the resource (mounts the file system) but doesn't leave you
with any Python object.
Best,
-Nikolaus |
|