Message150004
| Author |
neologix |
| Recipients |
asksol, brandon-rhodes, cool-RR, dholth, jnoller, neologix, numbernine, pitrou, rcoyner, santoso.wijaya, sbt, vsekhar |
| Date |
2011年12月21日.16:05:50 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.0736614e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1324483550.91.0.0679880012559.issue8713@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> There is probably lots of such code:
> I'm not convinced about making it the default behaviour, and
> certainly not the only one.
Then I'm not convinced that this patch is useful.
Having three different implentations and code paths doesn't sound like a good idea to me.
fork() vs fork() + exec() is an implementation detail, and exposing such tweakables to the user will only make confusion worse. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年12月21日 16:05:50 | neologix | set | recipients:
+ neologix, pitrou, jnoller, rcoyner, asksol, cool-RR, dholth, brandon-rhodes, santoso.wijaya, sbt, numbernine, vsekhar |
| 2011年12月21日 16:05:50 | neologix | set | messageid: <1324483550.91.0.0679880012559.issue8713@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011年12月21日 16:05:50 | neologix | link | issue8713 messages |
| 2011年12月21日 16:05:50 | neologix | create |
|