Message149809
| Author |
meador.inge |
| Recipients |
loewis, meador.inge |
| Date |
2011年12月19日.00:53:09 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00029424005 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1324255989.7.0.533302860937.issue13629@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> Is there a reason not to renumber token.h?
I thought about that, but at the time I wasn't sure whether or not that
would break anything. I went with the current patch because it is lower
risk.
On the other hand, proper clients of token.h should only be using the macros and should have no knowledge of the numeric codes. If they do use the numeric codes directly somehow, then that is their issue. So, I guess it is OK to renumber token.h. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年12月19日 00:53:09 | meador.inge | set | recipients:
+ meador.inge, loewis |
| 2011年12月19日 00:53:09 | meador.inge | set | messageid: <1324255989.7.0.533302860937.issue13629@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011年12月19日 00:53:09 | meador.inge | link | issue13629 messages |
| 2011年12月19日 00:53:09 | meador.inge | create |
|