Message 149742 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

In-reply-to
Author	flox
Recipients	flox, jcea, pitrou, pjenvey, python-dev
Date	2011年12月18日.11:28:34
SpamBayes Score	0.00030176656
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1324207774.89.0.705334284611.issue13575@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
> Is mro_internal's second call to type_mro_modified still needed? I was about to remove it, however I'm not enough confident on this. I have to understand how "tp_mro" and "tp_bases" interact in Python 3 (and the C extensions).

Content

> Is mro_internal's second call to type_mro_modified still needed?
I was about to remove it, however I'm not enough confident on this.
I have to understand how "tp_mro" and "tp_bases" interact in Python 3 (and the C extensions).

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2011年12月18日 11:29:35	flox	set	recipients: + flox, jcea, pitrou, pjenvey, python-dev
2011年12月18日 11:29:34	flox	set	messageid: <1324207774.89.0.705334284611.issue13575@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011年12月18日 11:28:34	flox	link	issue13575 messages
2011年12月18日 11:28:34	flox	create

homepage