Message149611
| Author |
ezio.melotti |
| Recipients |
docs@python, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, fdrake, flox, loewis, pitrou, scoder |
| Date |
2011年12月16日.11:09:20 |
| SpamBayes Score |
9.361817e-08 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1324033761.17.0.903654175636.issue11379@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> xml.dom.minidom is a [-XXX: light-weight] implementation of the Document Object Model interface.
This is ok.
> It is intended to be simpler than the full DOM and also
> [+XXX: provide a] significantly smaller [+XXX: API].
Doesn't "simpler" here refer to the API already?
Another option is to add somewhere a section like:
"If you have to work with XML, ElementTree is usually the best choice, because it has a simple API and it's efficient [or whatever]. xml.dom.minidom provides a subset of the W3C-DOM API, and xml.sax a SAX interface.", possibly expanding a bit on the differences and showing a minimal example with the 3 different implementations, and then link to it from the other modules' pages. |
|