Message149556
| Author |
skrah |
| Recipients |
amaury.forgeotdarc, brian.curtin, casevh, ced, eric.smith, eric.snow, jjconti, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, skrah, vstinner |
| Date |
2011年12月15日.14:00:50 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0013360763 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1323957652.29.0.640111460598.issue7652@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Amaury has asked for more comments (and I agree). However, I'm not sure what
level of detail would be appropriate. As an example, I've posted the full
proof of the x87 modular multiplication in umodarith.h.
Even with the Coq parts stripped, this would still be a massive comment.
Would you prefer that level of detail or should I just post the core
of the algorithm? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年12月15日 14:00:52 | skrah | set | recipients:
+ skrah, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, casevh, eric.smith, jjconti, ced, brian.curtin, eric.snow |
| 2011年12月15日 14:00:52 | skrah | set | messageid: <1323957652.29.0.640111460598.issue7652@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011年12月15日 14:00:51 | skrah | link | issue7652 messages |
| 2011年12月15日 14:00:51 | skrah | create |
|