Message149285
| Author |
techtonik |
| Recipients |
Garen, belopolsky, danchr, dhduvall, dmalcolm, fche, glyph, hazmat, jbaker, jcea, jmcp, laca, lasizoillo, loewis, mjw, movement, neologix, pitrou, rhettinger, robert.kern, ronaldoussoren, scox, serverhorror, sirg3, techtonik, twleung, wsanchez |
| Date |
2011年12月12日.10:47:02 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00015766708 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<CAPkN8xJfTX7=H2pWYN5Eyja79b=iqsEWAjTnArDKcQDsPXdd2g@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<CAH_1eM3K2HvO6qM+gps95Am4==cs4HK=rdfAo01tPybXhZ7yNg@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content |
2011年12月12日 Charles-François Natali <report@bugs.python.org>
>
> Charles-François Natali <neologix@free.fr> added the comment:
>
> > Alan, I would open a new issue tracking this one and posting a patch
> there, if I were you.
> >
> > Previous DTRACE attempts failed because trying to make everybody happy.
> I don't want to repeat the mistake.
> >
>
> Sorry, but I'm -1.
> I don't feel comfortable with adding a such amount of intrusive code,
> which will have to be maintained as the interpreter evolves, to add
> probes just for Solaris derivatives, which is, with all due respect,
> really a niche platform. So If we merge this, this should at least
> support SystemTap upfront.
>
Is SystemTap an alternative to DTrace? I see that SystemTap is only for
Linux, while DTrace is available also on MacOS and FreeBSD. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年12月12日 10:47:03 | techtonik | set | recipients:
+ techtonik, loewis, rhettinger, jcea, ronaldoussoren, belopolsky, pitrou, wsanchez, movement, serverhorror, glyph, laca, twleung, jbaker, robert.kern, sirg3, danchr, dhduvall, dmalcolm, mjw, Garen, neologix, lasizoillo, fche, hazmat, jmcp, scox |
| 2011年12月12日 10:47:02 | techtonik | link | issue13405 messages |
| 2011年12月12日 10:47:02 | techtonik | create |
|