Message149240
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
jcea, meador.inge, pitrou, sbt |
| Date |
2011年12月11日.19:11:16 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0014262222 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1323630666.3366.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<1323630280.75.0.282414108054.issue13577@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> > Note that extension (non-builtin) types will need to have their
> > __qualname__ fixed before their methods' __qualname__ is usable:
> >
> > >>> collections.deque.__qualname__
> > 'deque'
>
> I'm confused. Isn't that the expected behaviour? Since the deque
> class is not nested inside another class or function, __qualname__
> should be the same as __name__, shouldn't it?
Uh, yes, my bad. |
|