Message149006
| Author |
AchimGaedke |
| Recipients |
AchimGaedke |
| Date |
2011年12月08日.00:41:38 |
| SpamBayes Score |
4.409769e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1323304899.35.0.878509919082.issue13551@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Hi!
I tried to use the more general xml.dom interface, no longer defaulting to minidom straight away (or using etree).
The DOM tree gained with PullDOM seem to be incomplete.
Here is the output of the program attached.
$ python pulldom_test.py
with pulldom
(<xml.dom.minidom.Document instance at 0xb722962c>, [])
with minidom
(<xml.dom.minidom.Document instance at 0xb72459ac>, [<DOM Text node "u'\n'">, <DOM Element: a at 0xb71cb74c>, <DOM Text node "u'\n'">, <DOM Element: b at 0xb71cb7ac>, <DOM Text node "u'\n'">, <DOM Element: c at 0xb71cb80c>, <DOM Text node "u'\n'">])
I'd expect the same result for both ways of populating the minidom DOM implementation.
Thanks & Cheers, Achim |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年12月08日 00:41:39 | AchimGaedke | set | recipients:
+ AchimGaedke |
| 2011年12月08日 00:41:39 | AchimGaedke | set | messageid: <1323304899.35.0.878509919082.issue13551@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011年12月08日 00:41:38 | AchimGaedke | link | issue13551 messages |
| 2011年12月08日 00:41:38 | AchimGaedke | create |
|