Message148930
| Author |
mark.dickinson |
| Recipients |
cvrebert, eric.smith, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, pitrou |
| Date |
2011年12月06日.19:35:54 |
| SpamBayes Score |
2.104715e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1323200155.76.0.856361229351.issue13535@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
On the feature request itself, I have to say that I'm unconvinced. Doing x % (2**32) seems good enough to me, in situations where you don't need the bounds checking. (And it's not clear to me that needing the bounds checks is the more common situation.) |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年12月06日 19:35:55 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients:
+ mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, pitrou, eric.smith, cvrebert |
| 2011年12月06日 19:35:55 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <1323200155.76.0.856361229351.issue13535@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011年12月06日 19:35:54 | mark.dickinson | link | issue13535 messages |
| 2011年12月06日 19:35:54 | mark.dickinson | create |
|