Message148842
| Author |
ncoghlan |
| Recipients |
alex, belopolsky, eric.snow, jcea, loewis, meador.inge, ncoghlan, rfk, rhettinger, ron_adam |
| Date |
2011年12月04日.07:45:55 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0020405233 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1322984816.06.0.644104925994.issue11816@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
@Ron: Now that it has a reasonably clear signature, I could see my way clear to making the Instruction._disassemble() method public, which makes it easy for people to compose their own disassembly output.
For all the other display methods, I prefer Ryan Kelly's suggestion of supporting a "file" argument which is then passed through to the underlying "print()" calls.
This is inconsistent with what I originally did for the code_info() APIs (where I made a separate "give me the string" function), but it's the lowest impact change that avoids the need to capture stdout. |
|