Message148799
| Author |
skrah |
| Recipients |
docs@python, mark.dickinson, skrah |
| Date |
2011年12月03日.13:25:51 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.012366881 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1322918752.35.0.507229459385.issue13522@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Good point. - I just had to figure out if the pattern
Py_complex c = PyComplex_AsCComplex(w);
if (c.real == -1.0 && PyErr_Occurred()) {
...
will always be reliable in the future. The source of PyComplex_AsCComplex()
suggests that it will, on the other hand in getargs.c the pattern isn't
used.
The passage you quoted is quite clear, so I wouldn't mind if you
close this.
I'm not sure how many people read that passage though. :) |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年12月03日 13:25:52 | skrah | set | recipients:
+ skrah, mark.dickinson, docs@python |
| 2011年12月03日 13:25:52 | skrah | set | messageid: <1322918752.35.0.507229459385.issue13522@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011年12月03日 13:25:51 | skrah | link | issue13522 messages |
| 2011年12月03日 13:25:51 | skrah | create |
|