Message148531
| Author |
Voo |
| Recipients |
Voo, mark.dickinson, rhettinger, tim.peters |
| Date |
2011年11月29日.00:25:36 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00022586541 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1322526337.44.0.820205723098.issue13496@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
TBH I saw this more as an opportunity to get used to the whole system, how to create a patch, etc. :) Should've made it clearer at the start that this is unlikely to ever be a problem, sorry (didn't see a way to set priority to low myself).
If my math isn't completely off, the highest possible value here is
hi + (hi - 1) so this only occurs if hi > (MAX_SSIZE_T + 1) / 2. So this would only work out if we had such an array containing only a handful different objects. And then that's me assuming that a list is actually a thin wrapper around an array of PyObject*. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年11月29日 00:25:37 | Voo | set | recipients:
+ Voo, tim.peters, rhettinger, mark.dickinson |
| 2011年11月29日 00:25:37 | Voo | set | messageid: <1322526337.44.0.820205723098.issue13496@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011年11月29日 00:25:36 | Voo | link | issue13496 messages |
| 2011年11月29日 00:25:36 | Voo | create |
|