Message148337
| Author |
gvanrossum |
| Recipients |
gvanrossum, kxroberto |
| Date |
2011年11月25日.16:58:26 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0022360089 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1322240306.93.0.572233427854.issue13479@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Hm, this change allows many other *undesirable* objects pass the test as well. I'd prefer to stick to the rule, "when in doubt, raise an error".
Maybe using == instead of 'is' as the test would be acceptable? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年11月25日 16:58:27 | gvanrossum | set | recipients:
+ gvanrossum, kxroberto |
| 2011年11月25日 16:58:26 | gvanrossum | set | messageid: <1322240306.93.0.572233427854.issue13479@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011年11月25日 16:58:26 | gvanrossum | link | issue13479 messages |
| 2011年11月25日 16:58:26 | gvanrossum | create |
|