Message148305
| Author |
eric.snow |
| Recipients |
eric.snow, ncoghlan |
| Date |
2011年11月25日.06:09:28 |
| SpamBayes Score |
9.695575e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1322201369.94.0.963717599819.issue13475@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
+1 Both the -p and --nopath0 would be great additions and a good match for PEP 395.
So "-p ." would be equivalent to the current implicit sys.path[0] initialization, right? Would any other effects happen with "-p" than sys.path[0] initialization? I'll follow up with my one concern (the implicit "-p .") in a follow-up message. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年11月25日 06:09:30 | eric.snow | set | recipients:
+ eric.snow, ncoghlan |
| 2011年11月25日 06:09:29 | eric.snow | set | messageid: <1322201369.94.0.963717599819.issue13475@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011年11月25日 06:09:29 | eric.snow | link | issue13475 messages |
| 2011年11月25日 06:09:29 | eric.snow | create |
|