Message148267
| Author |
eric.araujo |
| Recipients |
akuchling, docs@python, eli.bendersky, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, rhettinger |
| Date |
2011年11月24日.15:59:46 |
| SpamBayes Score |
2.9570043e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1322150387.5.0.428766839273.issue13443@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Thanks for the fixed links amk. I think they can be fixed in the repo right now.
[Eli]
> I still think it's a bigger problem that the page discusses a module which
> is not available on Python 3.x - this means that a user following the page
> can't just type in the code and make it run.
It’s only one section that’s affected, so +1 to replacing its contents with just a link and short description ("the functional module does X and Y for Python 2"). Before doing that, would you have the time to contact its author and inquire about porting plans?
(BTW, the file is also inconsistent in its use of :: vs. implicit code blocks; I wonder if that affects doctest or the "hide prompts" button.) |
|