Message148089
| Author |
ned.deily |
| Recipients |
Lauren.Foutz, eric.snow, ghaering, jcea, ned.deily |
| Date |
2011年11月21日.21:16:14 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0012693896 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1321910174.84.0.794848019425.issue13445@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Support for Berkeley DB (the bsddb) was removed from the standard library in Python 3 and replaced by a third-party module (bsddb3) listed in PyPI which is better able to keep up with changes in the various BDB releases.
http://docs.python.org/py3k/whatsnew/3.0.html#library-changes
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/bsddb3/
What would be the reason for bringing back a dependency on BDB into the standard library? Wouldn't this better be handled in the standalone pysqlite package? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年11月21日 21:16:14 | ned.deily | set | recipients:
+ ned.deily, jcea, ghaering, eric.snow, Lauren.Foutz |
| 2011年11月21日 21:16:14 | ned.deily | set | messageid: <1321910174.84.0.794848019425.issue13445@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011年11月21日 21:16:14 | ned.deily | link | issue13445 messages |
| 2011年11月21日 21:16:14 | ned.deily | create |
|