Message147670
| Author |
ezio.melotti |
| Recipients |
baptiste.carvello, docs@python, eli.bendersky, eric.araujo, eric.smith, eric.snow, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, petri.lehtinen, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2011年11月15日.14:15:31 |
| SpamBayes Score |
3.161138e-11 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1321366532.24.0.684001648462.issue13386@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> Me too. (Can you give the #ids of these other issues?)
See for example #13012.
> I think we should fix C functions to accept kwargs for the sake of
> Python programmers, not merely to ease documentation (that would just
> be a nice side-effect :)
And also for compatibility for other implementations like PyPy. I'm still not sure that is a good idea to do a mass conversion of all the functions though.
> Sphinx lets us give multiple signatures. I’ve just checked that this
> markup is valid and does not create duplicate index entries
This is something I was considering, but I'm afraid it might get too verbose (and introduce yet another convention). Sometimes this feature is also (mis?)used to group similar functions. |
|