Message147630
| Author |
eric.snow |
| Recipients |
baptiste.carvello, docs@python, eli.bendersky, eric.araujo, eric.smith, eric.snow, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, petri.lehtinen, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2011年11月14日.19:51:21 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00015306714 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1321300282.25.0.688847778889.issue13386@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
>> 4) she got annoyed that two completely different notations where used
>> for two very close concepts
>
> This is a good point, and we are trying to move to the arg=default
> notation. Unfortunately there are still places that use the old
> notation. C functions that have optional arguments but don't accept
> keyword arguments are a bit unusual, and IIUC in most of the cases
> that's an implementation detail that could be removed.
So would it be worth the effort to identify each such place in the built-ins/stdlib and eventually change them all? I've seen support for doing so in other tracker issues and think it's a good idea personally. |
|