Message147290
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
ezio.melotti, jackdied, jcea, neologix, pitrou, terry.reedy, vstinner |
| Date |
2011年11月08日.12:50:55 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.002693108 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1320756380.3386.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<1320756124.7.0.499967171941.issue11812@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> If thread.join had a timeout , we could wait for a while and if the
> thread is still active, do a fake connection and another join.
What's wrong with a socket timeout exactly? Everything you're proposing
is ten times more complicated, and more fragile. |
|