Message146970
| Author |
xdegaye |
| Recipients |
François-Xavier.Bourlet, giampaolo.rodola, josiahcarlson, neologix, stutzbach, xdegaye |
| Date |
2011年11月03日.20:08:44 |
| SpamBayes Score |
2.7556317e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1320350925.26.0.646290297907.issue12498@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> I think the best would be to not handle POLLHUP events while POLLIN
> is set, so that the handlers can have a chance to drain the input
> socket buffer.
Ok.
> But it's a separate issue, could you create a new one?
The test case fails if the data has not been fully received by the
client. Do you mean that this new issue must be fixed first. Why a new
issue, after all this is the handling of a half-duplex disconnection
on the remote side ? |
|