Message146960
| Author |
erik.bray |
| Recipients |
alexis, eric.araujo, erik.bray, jkloth, tarek |
| Date |
2011年11月03日.18:49:07 |
| SpamBayes Score |
4.2439693e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1320346147.83.0.477244090654.issue11805@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> When run from an uninstalled checkout, for example when developing, the
> file will be found in the checkout. When run after being installed on
> a Debian system, the file will be found in /usr/local/share
> /spam/templates/log.txt. Each Python installation can decide (through
> sysconfig.cfg) where to install things.
Got it! I think when I first submitted this issue my primary concern was where the resource files live in different development/deployment contexts. Looking at sysconfig.cfg makes it all pretty clear, though it was hard to find this information a while ago.
So what exactly is the verdict then? Keep package_data for now, but encourage resources, and dump data_files all together? Or...? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年11月03日 18:49:07 | erik.bray | set | recipients:
+ erik.bray, tarek, jkloth, eric.araujo, alexis |
| 2011年11月03日 18:49:07 | erik.bray | set | messageid: <1320346147.83.0.477244090654.issue11805@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011年11月03日 18:49:07 | erik.bray | link | issue11805 messages |
| 2011年11月03日 18:49:07 | erik.bray | create |
|