Message146419
| Author |
ezio.melotti |
| Recipients |
benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, loewis, neologix, petri.lehtinen, pitrou, rhettinger, rosslagerwall, vstinner |
| Date |
2011年10月26日.06:41:46 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.1809717e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1319611307.67.0.266956628534.issue13263@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
It would be fine for me to rename os.sched_get_priority_max() to os.sched.get_priority_max().
os.sched.sched_get_priority_max() is a bit redundant, and I think it's not to difficult to figure out that os.sched.get_priority_max() corresponds to the posix sched_get_priority_max() function, especially if we add a note to the doc (I'm only -0 about keeping the original name though).
Regarding the other functions that don't share a common prefix it's certainty better to keep the original name. |
|